Aug 21


If you are in a local band, you are very familiar with the lugging of heavy gear, upstairs, through fire-doors, down narrow corridors, in fact quite often through an assault course of obstacles until you reach the stage or area where you are to setup your gear. With heavy back-straining PA speakers this can often be a very painful experience and quite frankly it is not what you really want to do before performing for a couple of hours.

It has been a challenge for speaker manufactures to create a very powerful speaker with an in-built amplifier in a lightweight package, especially as more often than not these cabinets need a vast frequency range to cope with anything from deep Synth basses to crisp sizzling hi-hats and therefore must have a 15” bass-pounding woofer as well as a high-frequency compression driver.

Mackie are a leading speaker manufacture and have been looking at this problem for some time. Their famous and most popular cabinet the SRM450 almost achieves this with a great sound and a weight of 40 lbs. (18 kg) but these are reasonably expensive speakers and still not very light in weight. With this in mind they have produced a cheaper and lighter speaker – the Mackie Thump. The Mackie Thump comes in two sizes – The TH-15A with a 15” Woofer and the TH-12A with a 12” which is even lighter.


I currently have a pair of Behringer B300s and these sound just great but they are very heavy at 63 lbs. (29 kg) each so I thought I would do a series of sound comparisons and specification comparisons with the Mackie Thump which only weighs and incredible 36 lbs. (16.3 kg). My first observation was that although I prefer the design of the handles on the Behringer (because you can get your whole hand around it), the weight and the weight distribution do not make your life easy. The Mackie handles are moulded into the design and whilst this is not as effective, the reduced weight and even weight distribution make transportation a doddle.

The Sizes are very similar with The Behringer slightly larger all round, yet the Mackie Thump TH-15A’s have more power being 400 Watt to the Behringer’s 300 Watt. Mackie Thump’s specs are:- 400W of ultra-efficient Fast Recovery; amplification comprising of Low Frequency 300W peak power (Class-D) and High Frequency 100W peak power (Class A/B). They have high-output transducers with precision 2-way crossovers and transducer time-alignment. You can download both manuals easily from the web and make more detailed comparisons if you wish.

As a minor issue, as I easily lifted my Mackie onto my PA stand, I noticed that there was no locking clamp fitted to secure the speaker to the pole. It was not a problem with the stands I have as they fit quite firmly but this could be an issue for some people, especially if the speaker would not stay in the desired position. I am sure there are many easy quick solutions to this and Mackie’s design team obviously decided that in order to keep the costs down this was not a big problem.


The Connections are different on these two speakers. The Mackie simply has a Balanced Mic/Line input connector and a Thru connector both XLR type, whilst the Behringer offered a little more flexibility with both XLR and a quarter inch TRS jack input.


I decided to start off by connecting a drum machine to get some realistic frequency range and see how the two different speakers compared. I set up both with no EQ and my first judgement was that the sound of the Behringer was warmer. I must say that there did not appear to be a significant difference between the two, well not to my ears. This pleased me because I started to think that it did seem possible to have no loss of quality but have a much lighter speaker.  My next test was with adjusting the EQ to try and achieve the best detail in the sound. The Mackie Thumps have an adjustable 3-band contour EQ with sweepable mid-frequency whilst the Behringer just having a simple 2-band. The Mackie’s obviously win here and with different input I was able to adjust their 3-band EQ to a greater extent to get the best out of each sound. I must say, I preferred the sound of the Hi-hat cymbals on the Mackie Thumps which were more crisp and defined. They reminded me of my Paiste Formula 602 Sound –Edge Hi-hats. I couldn’t believe how good they sounded when I first bought them.


The next test was to plug a microphone in direct. The good thing about these type of Speakers is that you don’t necessarily need a mixer, you can plug a mic straight in and if you have two Thumps you can simply daisy-chain the two using the XLR THRU connector.  I used a Sure SM57 and I found that I preferred the warmth of the Behringer, however again by adjusting the Mackie’s EQ, I found that I was still able achieve what I was after. There is a little bit of noise at low volume levels with the Mackie but for stage use this is not a problem. The Behringer also had some noise but it was a lower and quieter hum. I use one of my speakers as a vocal only foldback monitor so it is quite important to me as to how clearly the vocals cut through. I think that one of the main aspects that will help me considerably is the Mackie’s three-band EQ whereby I can adjust the vocal output to suit the different environments.


I connected my Korg Triton and used one of my own piano patches that I love. One of the songs that I perform has a constant low E piano bass note and this always sounded great on my Behringer and I wanted to be sure that I would feel the same on the Mackie – and yes it was very pleasing to me. It had that lovely deep thump without sounding muddy and it still cut through despite the bass player coming in with his powerful bass-line. The top end of the piano was outstanding and when you consider the price of these speakers, the quality is comparable with more expensive models.

Korg are great at string sounds and these sounded awesome through the Mackie very powerful full and warm sound. The more I use the Mackie under different conditions and input, the more I am convinced that it does exceptionally well in the high and low frequencies and it is only in the mid-range that it does not seem as good as the Behringer but I am not talking a lot of difference here. Other synth sounds and basses all sounded very solid and tight. The thumps can certainly handle these lower frequencies and I was very impressed especially as there was no Sub Bass speaker being used. Mackie also did make a Sub – the Mackie Thump TH-18S but this has now been discontinued. They now just do the SRM1801 1000 watt 18” woofer weighing 73lbs (33.1Kg) and costing approximately twice the cost of a TH-15A.


I think a good test is to put an assortment of music through, Rock, Trance, Dance and Hip Hop etc. My research shows that many DJ’s are purchasing the Mackie Thump TH-15A for many reasons but mainly the obvious: – Cost, Weight and Sound. The majority of DJ’s want that powerful low-end but not a distorted muffled sound. The fact that they can get that those cutting highs as well makes the Thumps a very attractive package to them and they can fine tune with the help of the parametric mid control.

I tried anything from Queen to Rihanna and a great deal in-between. I must say that despite what I put through, I seem to draw the same conclusions. If anything I would like a little improvement in the mid-range. This conclusion is only there because I have something there to immediately compare with.  In a real situation I would find the sound very pleasing. In addition, I may need to work a little harder with the EQ settings. In fairness to Mackie, the Thumps have the following specifications for EQ:- The HIGH EQ gives you 15dB boost or cut above 12 kHz. The MID range EQ gives you 15dB boost or cut centred at any frequency between 100Hz and 8 kHz. (This range will cover the male and female vocal range). The MID FREQ knob ranges from 100Hz and 8 kHz and determines the centre frequency for the MID EQ filter. (This allows you to zero in on the precise narrow band you want to have affected by the MID EQ. Lastly the LOW EQ gives you 15dB boost or cut below 80Hz. (It is here you can get that real punch in Bass Drums).


It is hard not to love these speakers with 400 watts of power at your disposal in a carefully designed incredible lightweight package. You can transport them quickly and easily to your gig and have the frequency range that satisfies the deep bass needs of most DJ’s and Synth Players all at an incredibly competitive price. Coupled with the fact you have 3-band EQ and Mackie name, sound quality, design and reputation, there is not much else you could want. I am not saying that the Mackie Thumps are the best speakers in the world but I am saying they are the best for their price and weight. They have a wide range of uses and you can pole mount them, use as wedge monitor or a stereo keyboard of DJ set up. There is nothing else out there that can compete on this level. They certainly suit my requirements so I have bought one.

One Response

  1. tonylongmusic Says:


    The Mackie Thump is an Active Speaker with built – in amplification.


Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.